This faculty explains why SAST is often praised by managers, and, because the tool needs to be very precisely tuned to the stack it is used on, why so many different solutions exist. It is common to find SAST tools directly baked in modern IDEs, or distributed as extensible plugins, because the closer to source code it is, the shorter the feedback loop for developers and the easier it is to remediate. When correctly implemented, it can protect against most of the OWASP TOP 10 web application vulnerabilities, such as memory leaks, cross-site scripting (XSS), SQL injection, authentication and access control misconfigurations. SAST is performed without actually executing the program, and it needs to be syntactically aware of the code and the program’s inner mechanisms: everything from language, dependencies, method calls, execution order has to be extensively scanned and compared against a database of known vulnerabilities. Often referred to as “white box testing”, it consists of scans performed on source code to identify the maximum number of potential vulnerabilities, before the resulting artifact could be even built. Static Application Security Testing is the most commonly used scanning technique. Moving towards DevSecOps requires a new set of automated testing procedures. In this article, we will see that, in a DevOps world, a lot of vulnerabilities may fall through the cracks if application security is limited to these classical approaches. Nevertheless, it has become mandatory to help protect exposed software, like internet-facing services where malicious behavior is common. Because it needs to be as close to production as possible, this kind of analysis happens last in the SDLC, and is, therefore, the costliest. On the other hand, DAST was designed to be used near the very end of the SDLC, in a complementary approach. While left shifting on their testing, software companies were also pushing to implement quality controls or even better, to enforce compliance rules as early as possible in the software development cycle. Acting as safeguards, they help developers produce better, safer code by peeking into source code for potential issues. The ever-growing list of SAST offerings should be a pretty good indicator of the high demand existing for security automation tools in the SDLC. They establish rigorous protocols at the very beginning and near the end of the SDLC. Both are often presented as two complementary solutions, providing the necessary safeguards to produce vulnerability-free software. The need for application security testing has existed for almost as long as software development itself, with the most famous approaches being known as Static and Dynamic Analysis Security Testing. Introduction to static and dynamic testing Discover what are their weaknesses and how they can be complemented. So its not a viable solution.Static and dynamic app testing are cornerstones for any comprehensive AppSec program, yet they rarely rise up to the challenges of fully securing modern software. This does work, but makes the generated drawing fuzzy, I guess this is because we are drawing in lower resolution due to the scaling. Looking at section "scale" PaintCode suggest to play with the density metric in android to perform scaling. It seams that the generated drawing code does not take into account the scale of the device (as it does on iOS). Or in general all drawings that I make in PaintCode when drawn using the draw method generated by PaintCode are to small. This works very well on iOS but on android, the radius is 20 pixels not points, resulting in a far to small radius (now with the high res devices). The result is that whatever the size of the button is going to be (= the frame) the corners will always be nicely rounded with 20 points.I draw a frame around and then setting the correct resizing behaviour using the springs (see screenshot).In PaintCode I draw a button which is basically a rounded rectangle with a radius of 20 points.I want to do the same for android and have the following issue: I have been using PaintCode for drawing custom buttons for years in iOS, it works brilliantly. So please don't reply in offering other solutions for buttons in Android, I am looking for a solution with PaintCode. Note: Yes I know there are other ways of doing buttons in Android, but this is just an example to demonstrate my issue (the actuall buttons are far far more complex).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |